Alabama State
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
628  Paige Rankine SO 21:07
855  Artrailia Lesane SO 21:23
1,902  Tatiana Etienne SO 22:28
2,079  Shantia Wilson SO 22:39
2,510  Santina Williams SO 23:09
2,596  Kimberly Wedderburn JR 23:15
2,700  Sade Lavallias FR 23:26
2,791  Brandee Ebert SO 23:35
2,824  Shakailia Williams SO 23:39
3,179  Hayley Spears FR 24:20
3,233  Jerrica Mahone JR 24:28
3,390  Markia Bartley SO 25:00
3,821  Narricka Williams JR 30:31
National Rank #212 of 341
South Region Rank #25 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 8.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Paige Rankine Artrailia Lesane Tatiana Etienne Shantia Wilson Santina Williams Kimberly Wedderburn Sade Lavallias Brandee Ebert Shakailia Williams Hayley Spears Jerrica Mahone
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1258 21:07 21:20 22:27 23:36 23:09 23:15 23:46 23:39 23:39 24:20 24:29
South Region Championships 11/14 1238 21:06 21:26 22:30 22:11 23:11 23:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.5 658 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.3 3.7 5.3 7.8 11.1 12.3 13.5 14.4 13.8 10.7 2.0 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Paige Rankine 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6
Artrailia Lesane 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tatiana Etienne 157.2
Shantia Wilson 169.9
Santina Williams 200.8
Kimberly Wedderburn 207.1
Sade Lavallias 214.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.7% 0.7 17
18 1.3% 1.3 18
19 2.3% 2.3 19
20 3.7% 3.7 20
21 5.3% 5.3 21
22 7.8% 7.8 22
23 11.1% 11.1 23
24 12.3% 12.3 24
25 13.5% 13.5 25
26 14.4% 14.4 26
27 13.8% 13.8 27
28 10.7% 10.7 28
29 2.0% 2.0 29
30 0.3% 0.3 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0